Why? Because I've a lot of time on my palms, plenty of HP38 and 124gr bullets And that i merely simply cannot end tinkering. I just choose to find out if I can perform it.

There may be quite a variation from the published facts amongst The 2 through the years. Also, agree that there’s been a large amount of improve while in the powders them selves around the system of fifty decades.

I also like getting a lot less powders For additional calibers. It can be awesome when one powder can be utilized for various (or at least two) in the calibers I am going to possibly be reloading, or am reloading.

The question continues to be, when did these powders transform, and should they changed great deal to lot, is it genuinely a good idea to get in touch with HP and 231 the exact same powder?

This brings an entire new meaning to “regular masses”. This type of “Sweet setup” may or may not workout for yourself- you’ll have to be certain your autoloaders are “joyful” With all the bullet weights and demand weights used, but in my knowledge these masses get the job done rather well.

Thanks Chuck, I preferred BE because it worked effectively for forty Major, 9 Minimal and forty five. And I detailed hp38 being an alternate on my purchase mainly because it appeared that it was pretty corresponding to BE. The eight# jug will most likely previous me a couple of year so will likely be coated for some time but guaranteed would love a cleaner, slower burning powder.

I have a couple of open containers to use up of HP-38 & Universal, and then I will be down to CFE Pistol & Titegroup, with Special as an emergency backup powder. I did notice Cabela's experienced Universal in inventory, but I didn't get any.

Only other thing is your OAL sounds very long. I wouldn’t think it will induce pressures hp-38 powder to drop ample not to provide ample recoil impulse nevertheless.

If This can be your initially take a look at, make sure you look into the FAQ by clicking the connection over. Maybe you have to sign up before you can post: click on the sign-up backlink above to move forward.

. And also to not use like a similar equivalent powder reference from a significant professional explosives maker? I think not.

I also shoot IDPA revolver. That sport analyzed 19 distinct manufacturing facility cartridges in advance of deciding on a PF of one hundred and five. Earlier boundaries of a hundred twenty five ended up perfectly into +P ranges. Speedy powders such as Bullseye and Clays had been excellent at that amount and they are normal Manufacturing unit degree hundreds.

It's truly just the hp-38 powder other .... a quick burning powder only takes 1/two" of bullet journey to thoroughly burn up so the bullet virtually coasts out on the muzzle in a gradual velocity.

To even start to know If they're the exact same or shut seem to wherever the powder was designed over the bottle.

HP-38 is my go-to powder for the 9mm Luger cartridge. What it'd reduce in some ft for each second of velocity to other powders, it makes up for it in my pistols with better precision.